Abstract
Qualitative researchers are repeatedly placed in situations where their "academic armor" (LERUM, 2001), a professionally expected distance, begins to crack. Such moments are often accompanied by shame, irritation, or vulnerability, and are frequently treated as disturbances or risks to research. In contrast, we argue that emotional experiences hold distinct epistemic potential and can generate deeper insights into social phenomena and processes. By drawing on two studies (one on body weight and one on shame), we demonstrate how our experiences of being personally challenged and shamed not only made power and role dynamics in interview situations visible, but also opened up new analytical perspectives. In doing so, we contribute to current discussions on the role of emotion and researcher vulnerability in qualitative research, and advocate for institutionalized formats of reflection and support which enable vulnerability to be used analytically while also fostering researchers' self-care.
| Translated title of the contribution | Painful Insight: Vulnerability, Emotion, and Academic Armor in Qualitative Research |
|---|---|
| Original language | German |
| Article number | 9 |
| Journal | Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 27 May 2026 |
study areas
- 03 Health, Care & Well-being
Keywords
- qualitative research
- emotions
- Vulnerability
- academic armour
- shame
- Body weight
- Reflexivity
- positioning analysis
- emotion work
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Painful Insight: Vulnerability, Emotion, and Academic Armor in Qualitative Research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver