TY - JOUR
T1 - A global industrial perspective on lean industry 4.0
T2 - a qualitative wide-angle lens approach
AU - Hines, Peter
AU - Tortorella, Guilherme Luz
AU - Antony, Jiju
AU - Romero, David
AU - Walsh, Aidan
AU - Taylor, Darrin
AU - Alves, Anabela Carvalho
AU - Bertolini, Massimo
AU - Caiado, Rodrigo
AU - Demeterj, Krisztina
AU - Dinis-Carvalho, José
AU - Ferreira, Luís Pinto
AU - Fettermann, Diego
AU - Godinho Filho, Moacir
AU - Gaiardelli, Paolo
AU - Howe, Graham
AU - Inan, Guven Gurkan
AU - Kumar, Maneesh
AU - Le, Chi Hieu
AU - Magnani, Florian
AU - Maqueira, Juan Manuel
AU - Mula, Josefa
AU - Packianather, Michael
AU - Peças, Paulo
AU - Pereira, Maria Teresa Ribeiro
AU - Powell, Daryl
AU - Prashar, Anupama
AU - Rehman, Masood Ur
AU - De Sá, José Carlos Vieira
AU - Saabye, Henrik
AU - Erol, Selim
AU - Teixeira, Leonor
AU - Zak, Helen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - This paper provides an insight into the global state of Lean Industry 4.0 (LI4) with over 1,000 industry responses. The approach employs a rigorous qualitative open-response survey. Our findings indicate that there was no unified industry perspective of LI4 terminology. The evolution of I4 is taking a similar path to Lean and making the same mistakes by not focusing on leadership, engagement, competencies, and behaviours. Past academic research has perhaps over-emphasised the environment and supply chain. The benefits of LI4 application are largely in terms of efficiency, cost reduction, learning and engagement. This work contributes by highlighting research avenues: why a piecemeal approach has been taken by industry to LI4, why LI4 has not been more widespread, and more detailed studies around contingent factors). It also provides industry with lessons on how to implement LI4 and the mistakes to avoid such as seeing implementation as a purely technical exercise.
AB - This paper provides an insight into the global state of Lean Industry 4.0 (LI4) with over 1,000 industry responses. The approach employs a rigorous qualitative open-response survey. Our findings indicate that there was no unified industry perspective of LI4 terminology. The evolution of I4 is taking a similar path to Lean and making the same mistakes by not focusing on leadership, engagement, competencies, and behaviours. Past academic research has perhaps over-emphasised the environment and supply chain. The benefits of LI4 application are largely in terms of efficiency, cost reduction, learning and engagement. This work contributes by highlighting research avenues: why a piecemeal approach has been taken by industry to LI4, why LI4 has not been more widespread, and more detailed studies around contingent factors). It also provides industry with lessons on how to implement LI4 and the mistakes to avoid such as seeing implementation as a purely technical exercise.
KW - Lean
KW - global
KW - industry 4.0
KW - qualitative survey
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105008349244
U2 - 10.1080/09537287.2025.2509143
DO - 10.1080/09537287.2025.2509143
M3 - Article
SN - 0953-7287
VL - 37
SP - 225
EP - 246
JO - Production Planning and Control
JF - Production Planning and Control
IS - 3
ER -