TY - JOUR
T1 - Institutional Investors and ESG Preferences
AU - Pudschedl, Paul
AU - McCahery, Joseph A.
AU - Lopez-De-silanes, Florencio
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2024/11
Y1 - 2024/11
N2 - Research Question/Issue: We examine the effect of multiple environmental, social, and governance (ESG) scores on institutional investor ownership of firms and investor portfolio weightings. We are also the first to analyze the three individual components of ESG rankings to estimate the relative preferences of institutional investors. Research Findings/Insights: Using a unique panel dataset covering US companies and institutional investor portfolios over the 2010–2019 period, we find that while investors are driven to add high-quality ESG companies to their portfolios, there is a negative relationship with ESG when it comes to taking large ownership stakes. Furthermore, ESG scores are negatively related to the portfolio weightings of institutional investors, which raises concerns of greenwashing. Our analysis of individual ESG scores points to significantly larger effects of G scores in terms of holdings, and G is the only score with no negative impact on portfolio weightings. Finally, in support of systematic stewardship theory, top institutional investors allocate higher proportions of their portfolios to firms with high-ESG ratings. Our results are robust to the use of a difference-in-differences analysis addressing endogeneity concerns. Theoretical/Academic Implications: The findings in this paper offer important policy implications for institutional investors, managers, and policymakers. Given the ongoing debate on ESG scores, this paper shows the importance of examining greenwashing for investors who have a concern regarding the extent to which the valuation of assets might be influenced by unsupported sustainability claims. In addition, our study adds to the debate regarding ESG investing and stewardship theory.
AB - Research Question/Issue: We examine the effect of multiple environmental, social, and governance (ESG) scores on institutional investor ownership of firms and investor portfolio weightings. We are also the first to analyze the three individual components of ESG rankings to estimate the relative preferences of institutional investors. Research Findings/Insights: Using a unique panel dataset covering US companies and institutional investor portfolios over the 2010–2019 period, we find that while investors are driven to add high-quality ESG companies to their portfolios, there is a negative relationship with ESG when it comes to taking large ownership stakes. Furthermore, ESG scores are negatively related to the portfolio weightings of institutional investors, which raises concerns of greenwashing. Our analysis of individual ESG scores points to significantly larger effects of G scores in terms of holdings, and G is the only score with no negative impact on portfolio weightings. Finally, in support of systematic stewardship theory, top institutional investors allocate higher proportions of their portfolios to firms with high-ESG ratings. Our results are robust to the use of a difference-in-differences analysis addressing endogeneity concerns. Theoretical/Academic Implications: The findings in this paper offer important policy implications for institutional investors, managers, and policymakers. Given the ongoing debate on ESG scores, this paper shows the importance of examining greenwashing for investors who have a concern regarding the extent to which the valuation of assets might be influenced by unsupported sustainability claims. In addition, our study adds to the debate regarding ESG investing and stewardship theory.
KW - ESG
KW - disclosure
KW - financial performance
KW - institutional investors
KW - sustainable finance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85190944211&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/corg.12583
DO - 10.1111/corg.12583
M3 - Article
SN - 1467-8683
VL - 32
SP - 1060
EP - 1086
JO - Corporate Governance: An International Review
JF - Corporate Governance: An International Review
IS - 6
ER -